Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Using any star for a lunar
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2005 Mar 13, 09:45 +0000

    I wrote-
    
    >> I am puzzled about the value Bill has quoted for the angular speed of the
    >> Moon across the sky, at 14d 19'. Where did it come from? The Moon's motion
    >> fluctuates a lot, but I would have thought a more representative value
    >> would be about 14 degrees 30'.
    
    and Bill replied-
    
    >Thanks for your input George.  If you look up the Moon in the almanac
    >Increments and Corrections Table (59 minutes 60 seconds) it gives the value
    >of 14d 19'.  I also recall it from certain texts.
    
    ============
    
    Ah! Now I see what Bill is getting wrong. There are two quantities to add
    when obtaining the GHA of the Moon from the almanac, if you need it at a
    Greenwich Time that differs from an exact whole hour.
    
    Look at any daily page in the almanac, and at each whole hour is given the
    Moon's GHA and a quantity "v". You will notice that v is always positive
    and varies considerably over the month, and from one month to another,
    between about 3 and about 16, limits which can alter from one year to
    another. These values of v relate to changes in the speed of the moon
    across the sky, relative to the star background. You might take an average
    value of v to be about 10. Let's work using that assumption.
    
    With that in mind, go back to the increments page for 59 minutes and 60
    seconds. The Moon's increase in GHA, from the value for the previous exact
    hour, is obtained by adding the increment (exactly as quoted by Bill) of
    14deg 19.0', and the correction, which for our assumed v of 10.0 comes to
    9.9'. So the change in the Moon's GHA in that hour would be 14 deg 19.0' +
    9.9', or 14 deg 28.9', rather close to the value that I suggested earlier,
    for the Moon's average speed in GHA, of 14 deg 30'.
    
    I hope it has now become clear how the compilers of the almanac have
    designed their tables. They were free to choose an arbitrary value for the
    Moon's basic speed, on which to base the increments table, and then this
    required a corresponding range of v values to allow for the changes in that
    Moon speed in the corrections. And what they have done is to choose a basic
    speed of 14deg 19.0' per hour, a speed which even in the most extreme
    astronomical situation they know the Moon will always exceed. This then
    allows the v correction always to be a positive one, so the end result is
    worked always by addition and not subtraction. It fits in with the notion
    that navigators do not understand how to subtract.
    
    So Bill's presumed Moon speed of 14deg 19' does not represent in any way
    the actual speed of the Moon across the sky; just that it's a minimum value
    that we can be sure the Moon will always exceed.
    
    By the way, when the speed of the Moon in GHA across the sky is at a
    minimum, this implies that the backward motion of the Moon, the speed that
    it's moving against the background of stars (and everything else) is at a
    maximum. That backward motion gives rise to the changing lunar distance,
    which we measure to find our Greenwich Time.
    
    GHA corrections for other bodies:
    
    By definition, the Mean Sun moves at exactly 15 degrees per hour. However,
    the apparent Sun (which the predictions are for) has a marginally different
    speed, which builds up to give the Equation of Time. The almanac
    predictions for the Sun do not provide a v correction term, so that in
    interpolating Sun GHA between whole hours, such changes in speed are
    ignored, and a speed of 15 deg per hour is assumed.. To minimise the effect
    of this approximation, Sun GHAs in the main body of the almanac have been
    "tinkered with" by up to 0.15', before the final rounding to the nearest
    0.1'.
    
    Most planets move across the sky at a speed close to (and greater than)
    that of the Sun, in which case a small positive value of v, applied to the
    nominal Sun motion of 15 deg per hour, gives rise to an added correction.
    Venus frequently shows a retrograde motion in the sky, which gives rise to
    a negative v correction, so in the Venus case navigators need to apply any
    subtractional ability they may possess.
    
    The motion in GHA of stars is closely tied to that of Aries, slightly
    faster than the Sun at 15deg 02.46' per hour (relating to the shorter
    Sidereal day), and quite unvarying. So a special table of increments is
    provided for Aries, and no question arises about any v correction.
    
    George.
    
    ================================================================
    contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at
    01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
    Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ================================================================
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site