NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Why is a sextant like it is?
From: Bill B
Date: 2004 Nov 18, 16:43 -0500
From: Bill B
Date: 2004 Nov 18, 16:43 -0500
>>> for measuring angles?> Alex raises an interesting question. From what I could find, it was actually called Sexagesimal rather than hexadecimal. (I suspect I am about to learn something new here from Alex ;-) Had they been invented in those times grads are harder than degrees to divide by 24 hrs a day or time. I am guessing that without good value for pi, using rads would be out of the question, so it was the logical choice and we are, like it or not, stuck with that system. From http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Babylonian%20numerals Sixty is a composite number with divisors 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30, making it also a highly composite number. Because 60 is the sum of its unitary divisors (excluding itself), it is a unitary perfect number. And because it is divisible by the sum of its digits in base 10, it is a Harshad number. 60 is the smallest number divisible by the numbers 1 to 6. (There is no smaller number divisible by the numbers 1 to 5). Sexagesimal numbering is a numeral system with number 60 as the base. It originated with the ancient Babylonians It was later used in its more modern form by Arabs during the Umayyad caliphate. Base 60 has the advantage that its base has a large number of conveniently sized divisors , facilitating calculations with fractions. Note that 60 is the smallest number divisible by 1,2,3,4 and 5. Along the line of " we are by tradition stuck with it" word usage regarding heavenly bodies. I rise. I sit. I raise it... I set it... But a celestial body rises and sets. The only reason I can find for this is that is the way it is defined! Bill