Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: accurate sextant
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2008 Feb 22, 14:56 -0500

    
    Dear Fred,
    
    On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Fred Hebard wrote:
    
    > I'm mostly resisting any national comparison jokes here.
    
    I did not understand this remark. Would you explain,
    perhaps off-the-list?
    
    Alex.
    
    > On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Alexandre E Eremenko wrote:
    > > George,
    > >
    > >> What struck me was its rather strange
    > >> (to me) construction, in that the
    > >> index arm swings on the "wrong" side of the frame;
    > >
    > > This is not exactly so. The arm moves INSIDE the frame.
    > > If you look carefully you see that the frame has
    > > a complicated shape which allows the arm to move
    > > inside. The handle is attached to the
    > > "other part of the frame", behind
    > > the arm. Of course you can call the part of the
    > > frame behind the arm a bridge, but it is an integral
    > > part of the frame. The purpose of this
    > > arrangement is to protect the arm.
    > >
    > > Freiberger has similar construction of the frame.
    > > In general Freiberger looks very similar, except
    > > it does not have the inverting scope and does not
    > > have the scale magnifier/illumination device.
    > >
    > >> I ask those familiar with this
    > >> instrument whether they see any
    > >> advantage in the straight-through, inverting,
    > >> 6x telescope, compared with an
    > >> equivalent, non-inverting, prismatic ocular
    > >> of similar power and
    > >> light-grasp? Presumably,
    > >> the prismatic would be a bit heavier; are there
    > >> other differences?
    > >
    > > It is very much lighter, and lets more light through.
    > > In this telescope, the light passes through only two lenses.
    > > All astronomical telescopes-refractors are made this way,
    > > and the reason is to minimize the loss of light.
    > > So the designers of this telescope surely had the
    > > same reason.
    > > In addition, this is the only "modern" sextant telescope
    > > that has wires. Wires are handy for many adjustments,
    > > and make it easier to hold the object in the center of
    > > the field.
    > >
    > > In the old days (until approx. 1940-s) many sextants had
    > > inverting scopes with wires. However the SNO scope has
    > > a substantial advantage in comparison with these old
    > > scopes: much larger field of view, and much larger
    > > diameter of the objective lens. Again this lets more
    > > light through.
    > >
    > > Alex.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > >
    >
    >
    >
    > >
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site