NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: accurate sextant
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2008 Feb 22, 14:56 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2008 Feb 22, 14:56 -0500
Dear Fred, On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Fred Hebard wrote: > I'm mostly resisting any national comparison jokes here. I did not understand this remark. Would you explain, perhaps off-the-list? Alex. > On Feb 22, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Alexandre E Eremenko wrote: > > George, > > > >> What struck me was its rather strange > >> (to me) construction, in that the > >> index arm swings on the "wrong" side of the frame; > > > > This is not exactly so. The arm moves INSIDE the frame. > > If you look carefully you see that the frame has > > a complicated shape which allows the arm to move > > inside. The handle is attached to the > > "other part of the frame", behind > > the arm. Of course you can call the part of the > > frame behind the arm a bridge, but it is an integral > > part of the frame. The purpose of this > > arrangement is to protect the arm. > > > > Freiberger has similar construction of the frame. > > In general Freiberger looks very similar, except > > it does not have the inverting scope and does not > > have the scale magnifier/illumination device. > > > >> I ask those familiar with this > >> instrument whether they see any > >> advantage in the straight-through, inverting, > >> 6x telescope, compared with an > >> equivalent, non-inverting, prismatic ocular > >> of similar power and > >> light-grasp? Presumably, > >> the prismatic would be a bit heavier; are there > >> other differences? > > > > It is very much lighter, and lets more light through. > > In this telescope, the light passes through only two lenses. > > All astronomical telescopes-refractors are made this way, > > and the reason is to minimize the loss of light. > > So the designers of this telescope surely had the > > same reason. > > In addition, this is the only "modern" sextant telescope > > that has wires. Wires are handy for many adjustments, > > and make it easier to hold the object in the center of > > the field. > > > > In the old days (until approx. 1940-s) many sextants had > > inverting scopes with wires. However the SNO scope has > > a substantial advantage in comparison with these old > > scopes: much larger field of view, and much larger > > diameter of the objective lens. Again this lets more > > light through. > > > > Alex. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---