NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: automatic celestial navigation
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2007 Dec 6, 12:28 -0800
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2007 Dec 6, 12:28 -0800
Gary LaPook writes: If I understand you correctly you will get the altitude of the satellite by calculating or measuring the altitude of a star that it passes nearby......Why not just use the altitude of the star in the first place, kinda like normal celestial navigation? gl On Dec 6, 11:55 am, frankr...@HistoricalAtlas.net wrote: > Apologies for drifting off-topic here... > > There's another way to do automatic navigation: you let the satellite find > YOU. Ships at sea are easy to detect. A handful of satellites can track > every vessel on the face of the Earth assuming they're emitting some radio > noise (the electrical systems of any modern ship's engine produce enough > radio noise). Then when you need your position, you call up the satellite > and ask. And needless to say, you can ask it to tell you where your > "friends" are, too. There have been reports of such systems in actual use > for years. There are sets of satellites, supposedly operated by the US NRO, > that travel together in small groups. It's a bit eery: you can see three > little "stars" gliding across the sky together in a triangle a few degrees > across if you know where and when to look (google "NOSS trios"). > > Speaking of satellites, how about using them for small-craft navigation? > And, no, not GPS satellites. I'm talking about visual observations of low > orbit satellites. Satellite positions are as predictable as the Moon's, as > long as you avoid objects which maneuver frequently, like the International > Space Station. And if using a computer isn't cheating, then you can get a > line of position by observing a satellite's position in the sky (I'm > picturing tracking it with binoculars and looking for close approaches to > moderately bright stars). If I observe a satellite that's 500 nautical miles > above me, and if I can get its position relative to some star accurate to a > tenth of a degree, which should be possible, then I can get a line of > position accurate to about 1 nautical mile. If I have a rough DR position to > start with, there shouldn't be any problem with mistaken satellite > identities. > > -FER --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---