NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: The lost expedition of La Perouse
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2005 Jun 8, 15:12 +1000
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2005 Jun 8, 15:12 +1000
> From: Frank Reed > The French once upon a time had a claim to Australia following the > explorations of Jean-Francois de Galaud, Comte de La Perouse in the 1780s, I don?t think so! What have you been smoking Frank? La Perouse turned up in Botany Bay, following Cook who made one of only two landings in Australia there, only a few days after the arrival of the First Fleet in 1788. Although Britain and France had been at war not long before, and were shortly to be at each other?s throats again, relations between the two expeditions were cordial. However, la Perouse was definitely too late there to be making any territorial claims and never did so. This was the last news of him, carried back to Europe some time later by the British. Louis XVI was very interested in this expedition. On the steps of the guillotine he paused and asked: ? Y?a-t-il, au moins, des nouvelles de Monsieur de la Perouse? (Is there, at least, any news of Monsieur de la Perouse?) 213 years later we anchored for a night in the very same place in our little sloop, on our way further to the south. The suburb is still known as La Perouse, now part of the urban sprawl of Sydney. The airport runways are not far away. The revolution was a great and lasting disaster for France, as revolutions are wont to be. It wasn?t until they had, to some extent, recovered from it that they were again to make forays into the Pacific. They were sniffing around the southern coast of Australia but it came to nothing. It wasn?t until the mid nineteenth century that they secured places like New Caledonia and Tahiti as colonies.