NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: sextant index error measurement
From: Richard M Pisko
Date: 2006 Nov 3, 21:45 -0700
From: Richard M Pisko
Date: 2006 Nov 3, 21:45 -0700
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 13:14:10 +1100, Peter Fogg wrote: > The experiment you are working you way towards carrying out > involves observations made over a distance parallel to the > ground, close to the ground. Refraction will depend on your > atmospheric conditions there, and could be different to the > refractive effect from sighting from eye height skywards. > True, over longer distances or special conditions, and that explains a slight disadvantage in the US custom of using a vertical surveying rod for stadia derived distances. The method of using a horizontal two meter subtense bar, common in Europe, has more potential accuracy ... according to the texts. So: Place the sextant horizontally on a small but sturdy platform on a good surveying tripod. Then both laser beams will be in the same layers of air. Do not have either beam run close to a building or big tree, as there is such a thing as horizontal deflection also, and there are warnings against that practice in geodetic surveying. Depending on the weather, you may find the beams quiver a bit due to local mirage. Night observations are the best, especially if the ground and air temperatures are close to being equal, and the beam will be more steady. -- Richard, 2006-Nov-03 9:28:15 PM GMT - 6 hours for summer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---