NavList:

Wow, that NASA site is neat!   One thing I never realized was how high the orbits of GPS birds are, relative to many others.   Even though the orbital trace of a GPS satellite peaks at 55 deg, with the satellite so high someone standing at the North Pole would certainly see birds high in the sky.

I recollect a TV documentary a few years ago (can't recall if it was by PBS or National Geographic) where the put a crew aboard a (US)  Coast Guard  ice breaker which was going to voyage to the North Pole.  Part of the mission was to test the functionality of GPS at high latitudes (which they confirmed).    The funniest part of the documentary was when they reached the North Pole -- here's these Coasties all frozen and miserable with this triumphant "we made it despite the hardships!" demeanor.   Then up pulls a Russian nuclear-powered icebreaker -- and starts unloading a crew to film a hot-tub commercial at the North Pole!   Dancers on the ice, hot tubs, plenty of hot grub, party time!

Scott Owen wrote:

bruce hamilton wrote:

  

 I have a friend who often finds himself in the North as a ship's
navigator who says the GPS has problems because the satellites get too
close to the horizon. Even the the Gyros (both mechanical and FOG) get
wonky too. Fortunately, the sun is always up when he is there.

Does anyone have any published information on accuracy of GPS at high
latitudes?
    

Bruce,
Since GPS satellite orbits are at 11,900NM up, GPS high latitude
reception should be ok.  From the graphs of orbital paths I've seen
there is coverage at the poles based on the the number of birds and
constellation footprint.  A good graph of orbital paths is at:

http://science.nasa.gov/realtime/jtrack/3d/JTrack3D.html
[the above link will fire off a java applet go "full screen with the
applet" then from the satellite pull down menu click on select and
another applet comes up with the names of a lot of satellites select the
one you want and you will get a rather nice 3d depiction of the orbital
path] I am hoping that makes sense.

Clearly if a few satellites are not "healthy" this could easily hurt
high latitude reception and accuracy.  In my experience in varying parts
of the world [Pacific and Indian oceans from 40N - 40S] as long as I was
receiving at least 3 "healthy" satellites my GPS position accuracy was
good, more satellites was better.  I could receive both SPS and PPS
signals so I always knew my position very accurately.  The ultimate
accuracy of the entire GPS constellation is dependent on the current
status of "selective availability".  A very large or small error can be
introduced into the system and was when initially brought on line.  It
is the current policy of the U.S. to leave GPS selective availability
turned off thereby providing very good accuracy worldwide, well,
depending on the number of birds your GPS unit can receive.

-Scott


  

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---