NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: shooting indoors
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2010 Mar 24, 10:34 -0400
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2010 Mar 24, 10:34 -0400
Sliding glass doors are typically of double pane construction, with multiple sheets of glass between the inside and the outside. Then we will need to consider the parallelism of each sheet of glass to the others. Not all double pane windows are air filled, some are gas filled to increase the insulation value. We would need to consider the index of refraction for that gas, should it exist, compared to the nominal value for the atmosphere. The stiffness of the glass also comes into play, independent of the age of the glass. As the extent of the sheet of glass gets larger, the propensity of the glass to bend and displace under self and wind loading will be increased. How significant this is will be a function of the thickness of the glass, the angles to vertical it is installed and the like. Just because it is installed in a house, you cannot assume that the walls are perfectly vertical. Non-verticality will cause sag and deflection, which will vary with location within that pane of glass. Is the frame that the glass is installed in perfectly flat and planar? If not, then that glass will have bends in it, to comply with the greater stiffness of the frame. Assuming perfect parallelism with a singular sheet of glass (or shade), when we place that glass in the optical path, it will cause a shift (displacement) of the beam as a function of the thickness of the glass. First the beam will shift in angle as it enters the glass, then when the beam encounters the opposite and parallel surface, the original angle of the beam will be recovered. The parallel shift of the beam is a function of the thickness of the glass. To the observer, will that result in a slight angular error in observation? I believe the answer to that to be yes, albeit small. How significant is all of this? I do believe that the dip short to the opposite lakeshore will be a far larger effect than any prismatic effect. One quick way to tell would be to adjust the sextant whilst sitting indoors and now that the sextant is adjusted for the objects, step outside those same panes of glass. Without adjustment, perform the same observation, just this time do it outdoors. Assuming that the lake really isn't a pond, then the dip short correction outdoors will be very close the dip short correction indoors. That is, all things being now equal, do you observe the same altitude? And one small correction to Scott: there really aren't dumb questions, except the ones you don't ask! Best Regards Brad | "Confidentiality and Privilege Notice The information transmitted by this electronic mail (and any attachments) is being sent by or on behalf of Tactronics; it is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee named above and may constitute information that is privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to same, you are not authorized to retain, read, copy or disseminate this electronic mail (or any attachments) or any part thereof. If you have received this electronic mail (and any attachments) in error, please call us immediately and send written confirmation that same has been deleted from your system. Thank you."