Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: wristwatch chronometers
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2012 Apr 18, 19:20 -0400

    Paul,
    
    I noticed that expensive watch manufacturers never say in their
    advertisement anything about accuracy:-)
    (Which means that you can buy a $10,000 watch, it will go with
    accuracy of $100 watch, and you cannot even complain:-)
    I suppose that accuracy is not an important consideration for people
    who buy $10,000 wrist watch:-)
    
    And finding any such data on those expensive watches is
    really hard.
    I know that relatively recently a new type of escapement was invented,
    it is called "co-axial" and it is claimed that it is comparable
    or even better than the real chronometer (detent) escapement, but can be
    used
    in a wrist watch. Apparently only one watch manufacturer uses this
    new escapement, and this is Omega. The word "co-axial" ust be written
    on the dial.
    I wonder whether these Omega co-axial outperform marine chronometers
    or not. Unfortunately, the cheapest of them
    are sold at a higher price then chronometers.
    
    Concerning inscriptions on the watch "Chronometer", the Swiss
    have some testing procedure, which legally allows having this
    inscription. As I understand this testing procedure has little
    in common with real chronometers testing.
    
    Alex.
    
    On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Paul Hirose wrote:
    
    >
    > Today on the back of a magazine I saw an advertisement for the Rolex
    > GMT-Master. The "Superlative Chronometer" on its face interested me
    > enough to investigate this watch on the Web. I had never looked at Rolex
    > prices before. I just knew they were really high. And I was right!
    > There's no way in hell I'll ever own a Rolex. Anyway, according to this
    > site a mechanical wrist chronometer isn't all that accurate compared to
    > a cheap quartz watch. (The site also says "Superlative" is just
    > meaningless Rolex hype.)
    >
    > http://chronocentric.com/watches/accuracy.shtml
    >
    > By accident I also came across a modern (nautical style) chronometer
    > maker. I like the feature that keeps it running for a few minutes while
    > you change the battery. But I think it would be more practical with a 24
    > hour dial, big second hand, and an ugly but tough plastic case.
    >
    > http://www.muehle-glashuette.de/en/nautical-instruments/yacht-and-marine-chronometer.html
    >
    > --
    > 
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=119156
    >
    >
    >
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site