NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: wristwatch chronometers
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2012 Apr 18, 19:20 -0400
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2012 Apr 18, 19:20 -0400
Paul, I noticed that expensive watch manufacturers never say in their advertisement anything about accuracy:-) (Which means that you can buy a $10,000 watch, it will go with accuracy of $100 watch, and you cannot even complain:-) I suppose that accuracy is not an important consideration for people who buy $10,000 wrist watch:-) And finding any such data on those expensive watches is really hard. I know that relatively recently a new type of escapement was invented, it is called "co-axial" and it is claimed that it is comparable or even better than the real chronometer (detent) escapement, but can be used in a wrist watch. Apparently only one watch manufacturer uses this new escapement, and this is Omega. The word "co-axial" ust be written on the dial. I wonder whether these Omega co-axial outperform marine chronometers or not. Unfortunately, the cheapest of them are sold at a higher price then chronometers. Concerning inscriptions on the watch "Chronometer", the Swiss have some testing procedure, which legally allows having this inscription. As I understand this testing procedure has little in common with real chronometers testing. Alex. On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Paul Hirose wrote: > > Today on the back of a magazine I saw an advertisement for the Rolex > GMT-Master. The "Superlative Chronometer" on its face interested me > enough to investigate this watch on the Web. I had never looked at Rolex > prices before. I just knew they were really high. And I was right! > There's no way in hell I'll ever own a Rolex. Anyway, according to this > site a mechanical wrist chronometer isn't all that accurate compared to > a cheap quartz watch. (The site also says "Superlative" is just > meaningless Rolex hype.) > > http://chronocentric.com/watches/accuracy.shtml > > By accident I also came across a modern (nautical style) chronometer > maker. I like the feature that keeps it running for a few minutes while > you change the battery. But I think it would be more practical with a 24 > hour dial, big second hand, and an ugly but tough plastic case. > > http://www.muehle-glashuette.de/en/nautical-instruments/yacht-and-marine-chronometer.html > > -- > > > > > > > : http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=119156 > > >