Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Captain Cook's Sep 07th, 1773 Lunar revisited
    From: Antoine Couëtte
    Date: 2012 Jul 20, 03:10 -0700

    Alex,

    Aahh ! I would not have dared questioning the reliability of the Lunar Distances themselves as they have been certainly so carefully - and so dearly - checked, rechecked (maybe up to a zillion times) and printed ... and also because they have acquired a strong reputation as being consistently (much) better than 1 arc minute.

    Well anyway, that's a good idea of yours and well worth trying, so let's do it !

    From Ulietea Harbour (S 16°45'33" W151°29'48") the Moon Upper Limb Height was 43°29'0 at time UT = 17h02m55s0 and the Moon was in Azimuth 312°9. I am computing this way with the Moon first since most likely the Moon Height is the most reliable one for refraction correction and also for the reasons given in my previous post on this subject.

    At that same time, the Sun Azimuth was 080°0 ans its Lower Limb Height was 12°12'3, still a quarter of a degree off its quoted value of 12°38'4 . However we do achieve narrowing our Sun "initial error" by 2/3. Would that be sufficient, given the fact that the Sun horizon was land/hill-blocked ?

    Now, from Position S 16°45'33" W151°29'48" at time UT=17h02m55s5, Cook should have observed a sextant distance of 105°48'008 (same independent confirmation by Frank's Online Computer which rates my results as earlier : [QUOTE] Error in Lunar 0.1' , Error in Longitude 2'0 [UNQUOTE]) .

    Cook did observe a reported Sextant Distance of 105°47'04" while he should have observed an actual Distance of 105°48'00"5 .

    Almost one arc minute in the Sextant Distance as a result of 10 observations, ... by Cook ??? Is this an (un)acceptable hypothesis ? Printing blunder ? ... just on this specific Lunar, unfortunately one of the very few for which we nowadays can ascertain the Observer's position with a (super) great Confidence level ????

    Still seems an open question, no ?

    What do you all think (including Paul, Dave, Frank ...) ?

    Best Regards

    Kermit

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site