NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: False Horizons
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2007 Nov 20, 09:31 -0500
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2007 Nov 20, 09:31 -0500
You do need to know the semidiameter of the sun when using a reflected artificial horizon for precision work, as you match up the edges of the reflected and direct images. I suppose centering the disks would work to a few minutes of arc (1 arcminute = 1 nautical mile). Matching the edges you can easily get the error under 0.2' of arc, with practice. Timing is the most important parameter as the sun moves about 1 arcminute in 4 seconds. The refraction table on the inside cover of the Nautical Almanac would work (it's inside the cover of the the orange almanac, but further in on the blue one). The table also incorporates additional corrections, if I recall correctly. The dip table is separate. Running a level string at eye height is a good way of making an artificial horizon and would be the best for kids, in my opinion, due to the difficulty of finding the image in the artificial horizon. You might want to calculate the error involved in having the string deviate from eye height. Obviously, positioning of the string and observing point with respect to the sun's amplitude at various times of day are important. Good luck with getting kids interested for very long! Soccer or basketball might be a better activity for long-term participation, even if you're a lousy athlete! Fred Hebard On Nov 20, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Isonomia wrote: > Refraction errors on false horizons > > The great advantage with a false horizon for children (as opposed to > the sea), is that there is no need to pay for icecreams! AKA, taking > the children to the sea side - but more importantly there is no need > to know the size of the sun, the height of the waves, the height of > the person or anything else like that as they all cancel out. > > The great disadvantage is that you still have refraction through the > atmosphere (though not of the horizon!) and the only table I have > doesn't list refraction of the horizon separately from that of the > direct view of the sun so I would appreciate some information on this > error! > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---