NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Fw: Re: Still on LOP's
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2002 Apr 28, 12:44 +1000
From: Peter Fogg
Date: 2002 Apr 28, 12:44 +1000
Brian Whatcott wrote: Measure the length of the longest side of the cocked hat. Use that as radius from the MPP in the cocked hat's interior to draw a circle for a circular estimate of position. I suggest that has a reasonable chance of in fact covering the actual position. I think it puts the actual position in the circle, more often than not. ? An even simpler strategy might be to extend the LOPs out - as in away from their intersections with other LOPs, by the same amount, and parallel to the original LOP. As to the Maths involved I'm just guessing, but if they were each extended 10 miles or more outwards, would the likelihood of the Actual Position (AP) being within this greatly larger cocked hat be something like 80% or 90%? The really interesting thing, if this is correct, is that the fix position in the centre (centre in the sense of least squares) is exactly the same as from the smaller hat which has the same proportions. The only difference seems to be in the likelihood of the hat containing the AP: from 25%, according to the theory being examined, to 80% or 90%. I think this is another version of my earlier 'smudged lines'.