NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Octant precision, was: Sextant precision
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Sep 30, 23:42 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Sep 30, 23:42 -0500
I think the following passage is interesting from the point of view of our recent discussions of star-to-star distances, sextant ultimate precision and the quality of old instruments: "On 8:30 November 14 we were on the meridian of the Flores island, and at noon within 12 leagues to the West in the direction W by S (101 1/4 deg) from Montevideo; from here I took my departure point as Lat. 34d54' S, and Long. 58d57'30" West of Paris... "I also used my stay on the shore to find the correction of my octant from the distances between the known stars; it turned out that the altitudes measured by this instrument were 2" less than the real ones, and I always used this correction since then." NO, I made no misprint: he is talking about 2 SECONDS! This is from the XVIII century book: Louis Antoine de Bougainville, Voyage autour du Monde par la fregate du Roi la Boudeuse et la flute l'Etoile, Paris, 1771. Any comments? In XVIII century, he could determine the correction of his octant as 2" from star-star distances?? He was able to READ his octant to 2" ? Bougainville was the first French circumnavigator (1766-1769), and his book describing this voyage is aimed at explorers and navigators, rather the general audience. He also talks a lot about lunar distances. He departed 2 years earlier than Cook, so the method was quite new then:-) Unfortunately I do not have the original book, what I am reading now is a Russian translation from the French original. That's why I do not cite what he says about lunar distances, to avoid double translation. Alex.