NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Visit to Freiberg
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 May 26, 22:40 EDT
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2005 May 26, 22:40 EDT
Alex E wrote: "The table of correction is 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 0 -4 -4 10 6 -1 4 5 -5 4 4 3 14 The first line in degrees, the second one in seconds." That's fascinating! Do you have any idea how this calibration machine worked (or anyone else, for that matter)? Did you watch the testing in progress? And: "The errors I had in star distances are usually larger, and always positive. In principle they can be attributed to backlash, but I never measured anything after the sextant test." Would backlash produce errors like this (a consistent pattern varying with location on the arc that would 'mimic' arc error)? I don't see how, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that there is some sort of explanation. -FER 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars