Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Re: Sextant accuracy (was : Plumb-line horizon vs. geocentric horizon)
    From: Alexandre Eremenko
    Date: 2005 Feb 17, 18:35 -0500

    Maybe you can give a reference for this other web list?
    The explanation you suggest coinside with my own conclusions
    when I was trying to think about this incredible case 30 years ago.
    On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Fred Hebard wrote:
    > Frank,
    > I read recently on another list that the density of photoreceptors in
    > the eye is not a limiting factor in its resolution, apparently because
    > the eye can move.  Unfortunately, I don't have time right not to dig
    > this out and put it up for review.
    > Fred
    > On Feb 16, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Frank Reed wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >  Alex, you wrote earlier:
    > > "However there are well documented cases of much higher resolution.
    > > (One person tested in XIX century had resolution of 1",
    > > but this seems to be the world record. Several people were described
    > > who could see the phases of Venus with naked eye)."
    > >
    > > I mentioned before that I was skeptical, and it only dawned on me
    > > while I was throwing out last week's back-of-the-envelope calculations
    > > that one arc-second resolution is literally impossible. The
    > > diffraction limit is imposed by the laws of physics and gives a lower
    > > limit of 15 arcseconds under the very best of circumstances (under
    > > typical circumstances, this optical limit is about 30"). If Nature
    > > chose to pack more cone cells into our foveas than one for every 15"
    > > of angle across the retina, they would not yield higher resolution.
    > >
    > > Can anyone think of a loophole I've missed here? The diffraction limit
    > > has some fuzziness of definition (there's a pun in there somewhere),
    > > but I don't think it's enough to help.
    > >
    > > -FER
    > > 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
    > > www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
    > >

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site