NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Accuracy of ephemeris
From: Bill Lionheart
Date: 2017 Oct 16, 21:02 +0100
From: Bill Lionheart
Date: 2017 Oct 16, 21:02 +0100
Good point. Just an idea: how about we video the view through the sextant with the index arm fixed as the body moves above the horizon, then calibrate the pixel to arc correspondence. Video rate is 25 Hz at least. Would that buy is some more accuracy at very little expense (video cameras are so cheap they fit them in phones after all). Not that we need that accuracy at sea on the time scale of a passage, just doing this for fun. Bill On 16 October 2017 at 15:28, John D. Howardwrote: > Bill, > > The "Gold Standard" is the data put out by the Jet Propulsion Lab. They > have a public website called Horizions that you can access ( some of ) their > data. > > The limit on cel nav ( IMHO ) is time. We only record our time to the > second and the Nautical Almanac only shows data to the second but that is > .25 minutes of arc. Untill we record the sight to the hunderth or even the > thousands of a second we canot get better than .25 MOA - hard to do using a > hand held sextant. > > John H. > > -- Professor of Applied Mathematics University of Manchester http://www.maths.manchester.ac.uk/bl