NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Almanac Heaven: where Alamancs go to die
From: Robert Eno
Date: 2006 Mar 14, 13:12 -0500
From: Robert Eno
Date: 2006 Mar 14, 13:12 -0500
Thanks Frank, An inveterate and sentimental pack rat I am! But your post begs the question: If people are buying used Nautical Almanacs on e-bay, what are they using them for? Re: the British Almanac, I cannot tell you what they look like. As far as I know, most of us here in Canuckistan purchase our almanacs from the "Great Satan" ;-^). It is possible, however, that the Canadian Navy -- assuming that they still use astro -- purchase theirs from mother England. I know for sure that as late as the mid-1980's, the Royal Canadian Air Force was purchasing their sight reduction tables (AP3270) from England but their Air Almanacs from the USA. That was when the latter was published in 6 month intervals. Robert ----- Original Message ----- From: Frank ReedDate: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 3:04 am Subject: Re: Almanac Heaven > Robert Eno asked: > "What do you do with your old Nautical Almanacs?" > > Sell them on ebay? You can get two or three bucks for them usually. > > And: > "Since the late 1980's, I have been regularly ordering the US > governmentedition with its wonderful sewn binding and hardboard > covers (I purchase the > commercial version for my vessel's library)" > > Speaking of which, what does the British printing look like these > days? > And: > "Is there any conceivable use for old Nautical Almanacs? Will, > say, the > 1999 version ever be of use again through some cyclic mechanism > in the universe > (notwithstanding precession etc.)?" > > The "ephemeral" data is just that. Apart from that four year > cycle for solar > data, which is only marginally accurate anyway, everything else > is history. > Of course, the refraction data and dip table, the interpolation > tables, the > short sight reduction tables, and the explanation are all still > good, but > that's an excuse to keep only one copy. That said, I've got four > post-1975 > Nautical Almanacs at arm's reach right now (all from ebay, $12 > for the lot). > > You concluded: > "Or am I just being an inveterate and sentimental packrat?" > > Yes. > > -FER > 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. > www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars >