NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Altitudes, close to 90
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2004 Nov 26, 16:18 -0400
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2004 Nov 26, 16:18 -0400
Alex,
You wrote:
> Everyone knows that measuring altitudes close to 90 is
> hard, however I have not seen the precise explanation of this
> in the books on navigation that I read.
>
> As I think this is of more relevance to
> practical navigators than my previous message,
> I include a quantitative explanation.
>
> The source of error is that you cannot determine precisely
> the point on the horizon which is exactly "below" the body.
I think you have that wrong. The point on the horizon that is exactly
below the body is the point that the body is brought down to when the
sextant frame is exactly vertical. The problem is ensuring that verticality.
With a body of moderate altitude, one can swing the arc and fairly
easily see when the body reaches the lowest point, which is when the
sextant is vertical. As the altitude increases towards 90 degrees, the
apparent radius of the swung arc increases and the point along it
corresponding to the vertical becomes harder to determine.
Trevor Kenchington
--
Trevor J. Kenchington PhD Gadus@iStar.ca
Gadus Associates, Office(902) 889-9250
R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour, Fax (902) 889-9251
Nova Scotia B0J 2L0, CANADA Home (902) 889-3555
Science Serving the Fisheries
http://home.istar.ca/~gadus






