NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: An experimental Navigation list
From: Dan Allen
Date: 2006 Apr 12, 21:18 -0600
From: Dan Allen
Date: 2006 Apr 12, 21:18 -0600
On 12 Apr 2006, at 6:11 PM, Frank Reed wrote: > This is the ONLY function a discussion mailing list is supposed to > do with some degree of accuracy: distribute messages. If it > doesn't do that, then isn't it time > to find another server? I think Frank is making a good case for us moving to the new Google discussion group called NavList that Frank has created. Frank has done a good job of handling people's objections. Here is how things stand. The biggest questions and objections are: Q: Why move if NAV-L works? A: Well, the NAV-L archives are gone, and 98% reliability is not sufficient, so we need to make a change. Q: What about advertising in a Google-based list? A: It does not appear in emails, so if we continue to use the list via email (as most do), there will be no ads. Q: What if we do not want to have a Google account? A: You do not need a Google account if you want to stay email-based. Q: Who will make a new solution? A: Frank Reed already has created a new, working solution that appears better than NAV-L in most (all?) respects, other than it will require us to use a different email address. Changing email addresses are a fact of life. Who doesn't get at least one change a month from a friend or family member? PROPOSAL: let's all move to the Google group called NavList, starting May 1st. That gives everyone a half a month -- the rest of April -- to get signed up and used to it. We can enjoy a few more meta- discussions for April and then BAM! May 1st, 2006 comes and we're back to full-time celestial navigation topics. COUNTER-PROPOSALS that address these problems are welcomed, but so far I have not heard of any solutions that are as good as Frank's, and his is up and running. Questions? Comments? Witty-remarks? They are all welcomed. Dan