Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Another "emergency navigation" sight reduction method
    From: Hanno Ix
    Date: 2015 Jul 11, 17:49 -0700
    Brad,

    please excuse me if I do not address your points in detail.
    One thing is, I do not want get into a shouting match with friends.
    And also, I certainly may be considered biased.

    Further, I believe I touched on the salient technical points already when comparing the Bygrave.
    However, I did not mention the Flat Bygrave. That is indeed a great invention,
    and I enjoyed building several ones in different sizes and arrangements.
    They are beautiful, they work - and they are big.
    All needed to be 11" by 18" to reach 2' accuracy consistently.

    Ultimately, of course, it is the personal decision of the individual navigator what SR to use.

    I, however, invite everyone to consider what can be done so quickly, with high reliability,
    on a single index card, with only a 2 pg table and one diagram at small cost,
    and after only a short  time of learning.

    H
    ,











    On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Brad Morris <NoReply_Morris@fer3.com> wrote:

    Hanno

    You may wish to examine Mr. LaPook's version of the Flat Bygrave.  The mechanical objections to the cylindrical Bygrave you raise are obviated.

    If there is a choice between a series of hand and paper calculations or some manipulation on a Bygrave (of either cylindrical or flat type), hands down the Bygrave wins, IMHO.  Its far superior to a series of computations performed by hand, as arithmetic errors are all but eliminated.

    The Bygrave is accurate and fast.  1'-2' accuracy in less than 2 minutes of time?   Combine with low chance of arithmetic error?  No contest. 

    I've not seen any disclosure or publication of the time it takes to perform Hav-Doniol.   Perhaps the more experienced practitioners would divulge the elapsed time??

    Of course, I am biased.  I have an MHR-1.  That's superior to the Flat Bygrave as the angle between the scales is automatically maintained, just as in a Fuller or Otis cylindrical rule.  The MHR-1 also has a superior locking mechanism to a cylindrical Bygrave.  Beautiful instrument but an expensive device.   (The expense has driven the reproduction effort and indeed Gary's inventiveness).

    This isn't a knock on the Hav-Doniol reduction method.  In a recent note, you compared Hav-Doniol to the Bygrave, and came to what I feel is an erroneous conclusion. I herein question that conclusion.

    Brad

    On Jul 11, 2015 12:27 PM, "Francis Upchurch" <NoReply_Upchurch@fer3.com> wrote:

    Hanno,

    re: Bygrave etc

    As you know from my Fuller 2, I am no mechanical engineer! However, I found the Bygrave replica relatively easy to build, using ready available precision plastic pipes, ordinary domestic ink jet printer/gloss photopaper/+felt friction brakes/water proof paint spray. Easier than the Fuller (no clumsy brass cursers to adjust).No engineering skills required.Only real skill was the scales,(in my case, courtesy Wayne Harrison).

    I've used mine satisfactorily at sea for 5 years. Totally seawothy, waterproof and consistently accurate to 1-2'. Never had a "slippage" which is the main design problem. Only maintenance is annual service of the felt pads to prevent slippage. I think my replica could easily be built commercially at very litte cost, but again, I'm  no expert on that.

    The basic Brown-Nassau even easier. My polycarbonate replica is good at sea too.

    Obviously, not  necessary pieces of kit. I just use them because it is fun (for me anyway).

    The calculator is  better, but boring, and anyway, if calculator, why not smart phone/tablet with easy celnav /LOP app for pennies? In rough weather, any "calculation" is likely to be error prone just because of the rocking and rolling! Also, how many of us consistently get sextant readings to 1' in the back yard? Now how about in a 35ft boat in a seaway? Umh! Not easy! So total error likely to be mostly sextant readings in my experience.

    Hav Doniol best manual back-up for me, but I just like to use slide rules too.

    I'm hoping to test and compare different methods at sea in the next few weeks, health/doctor/children/weather and wife allowing!

    I still owe you some emails on the various  Hav-Doniol and BN adaptations.(which, thanks again for your  help, and Greg)

    Many thanks and keep up the great work.

    Francis

     


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site