Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Astronomy and Celestial Navigation [Really, GPS]
    From: hellos
    Date: 2006 Jun 5, 21:42 -0400

    Richard-
     "1) S/A cannot be selectively applied in a satellite to affect only a small
    region on the Earth's surface. The foot print of a GPS satellite covers
    virtually the whole hemisphere below the satellite."
    
    I think you misread my earlier comments to produce this. I was not and am not
    referring to SA. What I had been told was that DoD were telling specific
    satellites, at specific times, to deliver specifically incorrect information in
    their data streams. This is not the distortion that is used for SA, but rather,
    they were being fed gross misinformation. Perhaps it is SA--I don't know. But
    the programming that was originally done in/with the system apparently was
    fairly simple compared to what is now being done in real time.
    
    As to a region being small or covering a complete hemisphere...Small is a
    relative thing, but I don't think a single GPS satellite actually covers
    anything near a hemisphere on the ground, does it?  Suppose you told the
    satellites "When you are more than 30 degrees over the horizon for location X,
    change your data stream and lie about where you are, and go off frequency to
    create false doppler results while you are at it."
    
    Wouldn't that have the effect of effectively junking the data--but only doing so
    during the time those satellites were likely to be used in a much smaller area,
    since GPSes routinely try to acquire the birds directly overhead rather than at
    the horizon?
    
    And that would accomplish the goal, which is to allow domestic use of the system
    while simultaneously severely degrading it overseas. If you can keep the system
    "substantially" functional over the domestic US, while degrading it for a 5,000
    mile footprint or even a 10,000 miles footprint someplace else--that's much
    better than degrading it everywhere.
    
    I don't know how big the footprint they target is, the remarks I had seen
    indicated it was something much tighter, i.e. in the thousand-mile range. Can
    that be done by diddling satellites? Perhaps so, if you only diddle the ones
    more than 40? 60? degrees above the local horizon?
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site