Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Bowditch: Distance to visible horizon
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2012 Dec 6, 17:44 -0800
    One small factor might be the change in the definition of the nautical mile from 6080 to 6076.1 feet which changes the factor from 1.144 to 1.447 rounding to 1.145.

    gl


    --- On Thu, 12/6/12, Lu Abel <luabel@ymail.com> wrote:

    From: Lu Abel <luabel@ymail.com>
    Subject: [NavList] Re: Bowditch: Distance to visible horizon
    To: "NavList@fer3.com" <NavList@fer3.com>
    Date: Thursday, December 6, 2012, 11:38 AM

    I personally doubt that there would be a 3% change in the value of the earth's radius over the past 50 years; I believe it was pretty well established a century ago, even to the extent of knowing that the pole-to-pole diameter of the earth is less (by 8 miles, if I recollect correctly) than the equator-to-equator diameter.   So my guess would be that the change is due to revised estimates of refraction.

    As I mentioned in a previous post, it's hard for me to get excited about a small change in the last decimal digit.  That leads me to also ask the following:  It seems to me that refraction depends on a whole lot of factors -- temperature, atmospheric pressure, and even atmospheric moisture.   Is there a set of "standard conditions" on which the magic 1.17 value is calculated?   How does it vary with changes in temperature, atmospheric pressure, etc??



    From: Greg Rudzinski <gregrudzinski@yahoo.com>
    To: NavList@fer3.com
    Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 7:35 AM
    Subject: [NavList] Re: Bowditch: Distance to visible horizon

    Here is the explanation for table 8 from a Bowditch Volume II .
    A refraction factor is probably causing the differences. Also the value of the Earth radius may be different in the older Bowditch editions.
    Greg Rudzinski
    [NavList] Re: Bowditch: Distance to visible horizon
    From: Bill B
    Date: 06 Dec 2012 08:16
    On 12/6/2012 4:56 AM, Gary LaPook wrote:
    > That's interesting, the 1962 and 1975 editions give it as D=1.144 and
    > the 1938 edition gives it as D=1.15.
    First place I would look is the refraction values in the formula used to
    derive distance to horizon.
    Bill B
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site