NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Buying a sextant- a cautionary tale.
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 Apr 30, 11:30 -0400
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 Apr 30, 11:30 -0400
Frank, On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Frank Reed wrote: > By the way, as a hypothetical, how could you use a sextant with a dead > section, from whatever cause, close to zero degrees? > The sextant would certainly > be a nuisance, but it would still work. That's exactly what I am doing now with my SNO:-) (See my previous messages on unexplainable errors near 0). This section is actually only used for index correction. So I cannot trust my index correction, neither from Sun nor from stars, measured in the standard way. I use the stars few degrees apart. There are several convenient pairs visible from my balcony at this time of the year, and I am sure one can find such pairs everywhere in the sky. I use two pairs, one is Castor-Pollux, 4d30'.3 apart, another delta-zeta Orion, 2d44'.2 apart. I use essentially the same method as with the Sun: bring the pair together once on the arc, another time off the arc. The average gives me (the negative of) IC, and the difference twice the distance for control. My sextant permits to measure up to -5d (off the arc). This gives excellent results. The span in other star distances taken everywhere on the arc is usually no kore than 0'.2 now, with IC determined by this method. As my sextant holds its IC pretty well, I think the method can be used. Of course, if the arc is spoiled on a larger interval, say 10 degrees around zero or more, one has to determine the IC from usual star distances which fall on the unspoiled part. Alex. P.S. One can probably use some convenient electric wires for the same purpose.