NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Bygrave and Chichester
From: Douglas Denny
Date: 2009 Aug 1, 10:35 -0700
From: Douglas Denny
Date: 2009 Aug 1, 10:35 -0700
My interest in the Bygrave helical slide rule too Gary, was stimulated when I read Chichester's book 'The Lonely Sea and the Sky' many years ago. I have been hoping ever since to find one, perhaps one of them would turn up in an antique shop or 'car boot sale', but now realise that fond dream is far from ever becoming a reality. It is very strange that they are now so incredibly rare considering they must have been made in reasonably large numbers from the early 1920's up to the mid 1930's, and were also an official piece of navigating 'kit' for aircraft navigators in that period for the RAF, so must have been made in fairly large numbers rather than just a relatively few for experimental purposes. They were also available to buy privately. So what happened to them all? It's most odd. Even the most arcane scientific apparatus and instruments are usually preserved or survive in private hands to be sold on or given away to others rather than just binned. Are all those RAF Bygrave slide rules still locked away in some old, musty, forgotten RAF or government store at the back of dusty shelves awaiting some storekeeper to find them and be told to put them in an auction of ex-government surplus. (Still dreaming you see !). Whilst the skill and amazing endeavour of what Chichester achieved is not to be denied an any way, (and you have now confirmed by your own practical flying test in a Tiger Moth); which was immediately apparent to me when I read of the exploit, and it has continued to amaze me still - with what he wrote I was also filled with the astonishment and feelings that Chichester was idiotically reckless in what he did,..(I think) to the point of insanity. Given that he writes in a style which is deliberately meant to make his story not just interesting but no doubt boost his (Chichester's) reputation, and sales of the book, and hopefully have the reader clutching the book with white knuckles in anticipation of events unfolding; nevertheless, he exposes a devil-may-care attitude of quite serious stupidity and ignores issues of high importance which any right-thinking person would not consider reasonable, and certainly not anyone who knows anything about flying and the consequences involved in flying solo in a single engined aitrcraft with a 'dodgy' engine over large stretches of water. ---------- I had a personal friend who taught me to fly, he was the Chief Flying Instructor at Bembridge flying school, and who very nearly lost his life when the donkey of the Cessna 150 stopped en route, mid - Solent, as he was flying back to Bembridge from Goodwood, (The Solent is the sea - only four miles of water between the Isle of Wight and the mainland) -and after turning downwind towards the mainland to maximise his ground traverse, he did not make it and was down in the drink only a matter of some hundreds of yards from the shore, ..and with the SAR helicopter already above him searching for him in the water (he had made a mayday with the SAR only a few miles away at Gosport) - but they only saw him at the last minute before he sank under the waves almost unconscious. The only reason he survived was because a plastic bag with polystyrene packing in it which had been carelessly thrown in the back seat (the radio had just been changed) floated past him as he was thrown out of the open windshield opening (the windshield had gone on impact with the water) - and he happened to grab it as it went by. -------------- The probability of engine failure in modern times with a brand new aircraft with engine properly run-in might be very low; and one might make a reasonable choice of that risk of probability being very low indeed for engine failure; but it is still one _I_ would not take under any circumstances. Two engines for me at least over water every time thank you!) ... but Chichester describes in his book earlier engine troubles; and compounds his recklessness when on Norfolk Island when about to take off. He tried swinging the prop to test the compression of the cylinders and he found:- "No4 bad enough, but No 3 had no compresion at all" .... so he had just flown to Norfolk Island with a seriously flawed engine already and yet _still_ tried to take off ! He then spends a few days taking the engine apart where:- "a man named Brent, who turned out to be a crack mechanic, gave me enormous help with the plane... holding the detatched cylinder head, he said: "Your lucky, aren't you? Look at this!" The exhaust and inlet valves had been changed over, (Note: this is incredulous in it's own right -Douglas) ...and the metal seating of exhaust valve had begun to unscrew and was already a third of the way out. "It's a wonder it did not come right out and jam the valve port open or shut, in which case the motor would have broken up", he said ..." I am very highly impressed with Chichester's brilliant navigational skills and the sheeer courage and tenacity with his achievement of such an amazing feat; but at the same time am excoriatingly critical of his cavalier attitude to his own fate. I think he must have been slightly insane. Douglas Denny. Chichester(City) England. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---