Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Calculating Ha from Hc
    From: Sean C
    Date: 2014 Mar 27, 11:44 -0700

    Frank, you wrote:
    "But what is your purpose here? What are you trying to calculate?"

    I am trying to approximate, as closely as possible with the formulas found in the N.A., what would be the *apparent* altitude of the bodies at the time of the lunar. I've been shooting from my front yard at night, so no natural horizon. I am currently experimenting with coffee and soon, motor oil as an AH. Until then, I must calculate the altitudes. The way I see it, there are basically three ways I can use the equations given on your lunars page: Use the directly calculated altitude for H_Moon OR use Hc to calculate PA & refraction and subtract those from Hc to approximate Ha OR use the method I outlined in my previous post to more closely approximate PA, refraction & Ha. Conveniently, ICE gives all of the corrections alongside the Hc. But, as you've pointed out, it's getting increasingly inaccurate, especially regarding the Moon. Besides, I wanted to try out MICA!

    So, as an example, I'll use a lunar I shot on March 24th of this year (2014). Here's the raw data:

    2014 Mar. 24
    Moon-Venus Lunar (Near Limb)
    AP: N 37° 03.3', W 076° 28.6'
    Altitude: 40 ft.
    Temp.: 30.5 °F
    Press.: 30.30 inHg
    Watch Error: 0
    Index Error: 0

    (Note: I ignored the temp./press. correction for this exercise.)

    UTC: 11h 12m 27s
    LDs: 38°01.8'

    ____UTC__________LDc____

    11h 00m 00s.....38°29.6'
    11h 12m 27s.....38°22.9'
    12h 00m 00s.....37°57.0'
    ________________________

    Now, here are my results from the three methods I mentioned above:

    #1: I used LHA & Dec. to calculate Hc. I used Hc to calculate PA, subtracted PA from Hc and used the result to calculate refraction. I used Hc directly for H_Moon. (Same process for Venus, only no PA calculated as I could not find the HP in MICA.)

    Moon
    Hc: 34°27.3'
    HP: 59.1'
    PA: 48.7'
    R : -1.5'
    DH_Moon: 47.2'
    SD: 16.1'
    Aug.: 0.2'

    Venus
    Hc: 23°17.9'
    R : -2.3'
    DH_Venus: -2.3'

    A: -0.094830649
    B: 0.448602174
    Q: 0.000124222

    Corr. LD: 38°23.6' Error: 0.7'
    Interpolated Time: 11h 11m 03s Error: -1m 24s
    Error in Longitude: 21.0'
    ---------------------------------------------

    #2: Same as the first example, only I subtracted PA and refraction from Hc to approximate Ha. All values not listed remained the same. I used Ha for H_Moon. (Again, same for Venus, no PA.)

    Moon
    Ha: 33°40.1'

    Venus
    Ha: 23°20.2'

    A: -0.075459348
    B: 0.427897849
    Q: 0.000124635

    Corr. LD: 38°22.6' Error: -0.3'
    Interpolated Time: 11h 12m 47s Error: 20s
    Error in Longitude: 5.0'
    -----------------------------------------

    #3: I used the method I described in my previous post to more closely approximate Ha. Again, all values not listed remained the same as in #1. Note the different PA & DH values. I'd also like to point out that these values most closely match those computed by your online calculator.

    Moon
    PA: 49.2'
    DH_Moon: 47.7'
    Ha: 33°39.6'

    Venus
    Ha: 23°20.2'

    A: -0.075267894
    B: 0.427685138
    Q: 0.000127294

    Corr. LD: 38°22.7' Error: -0.2'
    Interpolated Time: 11h 12m 42s Error: 15s
    Error in Longitude: 3.8'
    -----------------------------------------

    So, although this lunar does not quite fit into your description of "short distance lunars (less than 20°)", it also does little (or nothing) to disprove the assertion that, "an error of +/-6 minutes of arc in the altitude of the Sun or other body will not lead to an error greater than a tenth of a minute in the cleared distance." (Even though the difference here was only 0.5'.)

    You also wrote:
    "I'm not sure what you're getting at here. What are you doing with the observed time? If I interpret that phrase 'however little' literally, then I would say 'yes'. A small change leads to a small change. But is it significant?"

    I must admit, I'm not sure what you mean by asking what I'm doing with the time. I use the calculated distances on the hours before and after the lunar to determine the change in distance per minute. Then, I use the corrected distance to interpolate the minutes and seconds at which the lunar was shot. I then compare this to what I know to be the actual time. Beyond that, I'm not doing anything with it. As to whether or not such a small difference is significant: I think that's subjective. At sea, probably not...but it matters to me.

    As a side note: a quick check seemed to indicate that my results would have been very similar if I had just used the corrections from the N.A., with or without using my method. Also, although ICE gives a GHA that is -0.1' different than MICA, all of the corrections match those I calculated using my method (#3).

    Now, I'm ready for everyone to tell me where I screwed up! Lol. :)

    Regards,
    Sean C.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.navlist.net/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]navlist.net
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    NavList is a community devoted to the preservation and practice of celestial navigation and other methods of traditional position-finding. We're a group of navigators, navigation enthusiasts and hobbyists, mathematicians and physicists, and historians interested in all aspects of navigation but primarily those techniques which are non-electronic.

    To post a message, if you are already signed up as a NavList member, start a new discussion or reply to any posted message and use your posting code (this is a simple low-security password assigned when you join). You may also join by posting. Your first on-topic messsage automatically makes you a member, and a posting code will be assigned and emailed to you for future posts.

    Uniquely, the NavList message boards also permit full interaction entirely by email. You can optionally receive individual posts or daily digests by email, and any member can post messages by email (bypassing the web site) by sending to our posting address which is "NavList@NavList.net". This functionality is similar to a traditional Internet mailing list: post by email, read by email, reply by email. Most members will prefer the web interface here for posting and replying to messages.

    NavList is more than an online community... more about that another day.

    © Copyright notice: please note that the rights to all messages and posts in this discussion group are held by their respective authors. No messages or text or images extracted from messages may be reproduced without the explicit consent of the message author. Email me, Frank Reed, if you have any questions.

    Join / Get NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site