Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Calculating Twilight
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2014 Sep 20, 11:17 -0700
    Polaris was a particularly popular star with flight navigators because of the much simpler calculation compared to using HO 208, HO 249, etc, as needed for other stars. It also provides a convenient heading check for the plane when using the periscopic sextant because the mount has an azimuth scale. Of course, flight navigators use bubble sextant so can take sights in the dark of the night when second magnitude Polaris is clearly visible. It is certainly "fair" to preset the sextant and was absolutely necessary when using the periscopic sextant because of the small field of view. For Polaris just set your sextant for your latitude and Polaris will most likely be in the index mirror since its height   is never as much as one degree away from your latitude.

    gl


    From: Frank Reed <NoReply_FrankReed@fer3.com>
    To: garylapook@pacbell.net
    Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2014 6:56 PM
    Subject: [NavList] Re: Calculating Twilight

    Bruce, you wrote:
    "I could preset the angle, but that is not a “fair” procedure."
    You should preset the angle. It's a fair procedure, in the sense of corresponding to reasonable sea practice. A navigator is never lost. You always have some rough idea of your position unless you've been thrown into some new navigating situation --when would that happen in the modern world? ...maybe a reality tv show dumps you somewhere in mid-ocean?? And even then, you're only really "lost" for a couple of hours if you can see the stars. As soon as you have a rough latitude, presetting the sextant is 100% legitimate and "fair".
    I agree, though, that latitude by Polaris is much more difficult than you might expect. It requires a crisp horizon (yes, more difficult near shore), careful timing, and also it helps to be properly dark-adapted. In morning twilight, if you avoid lights, you'll be able to see the horizon earlier than normal. In evening twilight, this is harder to arrange since it takes about fifteen minutes to become properly dark-adapted. That fifteen minute period happens to be roughly the pace of the transition from light to dark in twilight, so in evening twilight, by the time you're dark-adapted it's probably too late (I suppose a case might even be made that human vision did not evolve with faster dark adaptation because the speed of twilight is the main selective factor).


    -FER
     


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site