NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Chronometer rating
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2024 Feb 26, 13:00 -0800
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2024 Feb 26, 13:00 -0800
> *From: *Noell Wilson > *Date: *2024 Jan 26, 07:33 -0800 > > "The very few ship’s chronometers that I have seen are > simply high-grade pocket watch movements in a gimbal mounting and the > whole thing in a nice box. They are typically rated for positions and > temperature. Also, with non-magnetic hairsprings. The temperature > compensation is accomplished due to bi-metallic rim of balance wheel > which is cut at (2) opposed locations. A railroad grade pocket watch > movement has the same construction." > > The above is from someone who repairs mechanical watches and clocks and > is willing to open up an Omega watch. His opinion seems to slightly > short-change choronometers but I don't know enough to judge. I thought marine chronometers had a special escapement (not found even on railroad grade pocket watches) to keep the balance wheel as free as possible. Also, there was a mechanism to maintain constant force as the mainspring ran down. And perhaps a helical (not spiral) balance spring? This nautical magazine article from the 1850s doesn't clear up those points, but it's interesting nevertheless. "Chronometers For Her Majesty's Ships" https://archive.org/details/the-nautical-magazine-and-naval-chronicl-1858/page/349/mode/2up?view=theater -- Paul Hirose sofajpl.com