NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Classic Trig Log SR with Ageton Pub 211
From: Hanno Ix
Date: 2015 Jul 24, 08:30 -0700
If the table is going to be copied on regular copy machines contrasts will
be reduced from generation to generation. If contrast is important
From: Hanno Ix
Date: 2015 Jul 24, 08:30 -0700
Greg,
thanks!My personal choice would have been 50. But here is the advice I received
from a former colleague, a graphic designer, with whom I discussed the
patterns after I sent them to you.
from a former colleague, a graphic designer, with whom I discussed the
patterns after I sent them to you.
51 and 52 would not be a good choice because the contrast is small to
begin with. In 50 and 53 contrast does not matter so much as the fonts are
begin with. In 50 and 53 contrast does not matter so much as the fonts are
so very different. 56 would be an excellent choice if the copies are guaranteed
to be made in color.
In BW, for this purpose his choice would be 57 with the size of the first 2 digits
somewhat reduced.
to be made in color.
In BW, for this purpose his choice would be 57 with the size of the first 2 digits
somewhat reduced.
There you have it! I am sending this to you to give you the benefit of
his advice before we continue. You may want to look at the samples
again with it in mind. For me, any pattern is equally easy to implement.
again with it in mind. For me, any pattern is equally easy to implement.
H
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Greg Rudzinski <NoReply_Rudzinski@fer3.com> wrote:
Hanno,
Lets try 51, 50, and 56 in that order. Thanks
Greg Rudzinski
