NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Coastal Plotting Sheets
From: Michael Bradley
Date: 2007 Mar 26, 17:58 +0100
From: Michael Bradley
Date: 2007 Mar 26, 17:58 +0100
Peter
P F wrote:
'What this coastal nav course proposed was taking the
same three
corrected bearings but plotting from the fix position
onto clear
material from a point on the plastic sheet
representing the side
opposite to the land � the seaward side. So three
position lines
radiating outwards.'
I left it a week, but no-one else has jumped in.
Regardless of the tool used for the plotting, such as
'clear sheet', a station pointer, or a Douglas
Protractor, what has been suggested to you in that
technique is downright dangerous. There are two
reasons for this.
From three LOPs gained from the hand bearing compass,
suitably corrected, plotted normally, you produce on
the plot a cocked hat which warns by its size if one
of the LOPS is inaccurate. If you use the horizontal
sextant angle station pointer type method of plotting
that same data, it does not indicate any error, it
just generates an apparently ambiguity free dot on the
plot which is almost certainly wrong.
Furthermore, the horizontal sextant angle station
pointer type method itself is notorious for a poor
angle of cut built into its geometry, particularly if
the 'middle' object sighted is further away than the
two 'side' objects sighted.
Don't be tempted by what you've been told - a tidy
plot is not the same thing as an useful plot.
Michael Bradley
___________________________________________________________
All New Yahoo! Mail � Tired of unwanted email come-ons? Let our SpamGuard
protect you. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@navlist.net
To , send email to NavList-@navlist.net
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---






