NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Creamer's navigation without instruments. was:[NAV-L] The point of it all
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2006 Jun 27, 20:15 +0100
From: George Huxtable
Date: 2006 Jun 27, 20:15 +0100
Peter Fogg wrote- | | > "If a zenith body can be found and identified then the | > boat's position is known." and I replied- | > No, it isn't. Not unless you know the time. How do you get that, | > without any instrument? To which Peter's reply was- | Refer to helpful comment above re lack of precision. To put that another | way, how would he not have at least a rough idea of the time? Lack of | precision is not necessarily the same as lack of accuracy. Folk without a | written language tend to have great memories and compensating skills we may | find difficult to comprehend. Without a clock they may get better, for | example, at estimating the passage of time. Remember that the apparent | movement of the stars across the night sky is itself akin to a giant clock, | or reference. The point I was trying to make, that I took as the moral of | Creamer's accomplishment, is that nav should be a holistic process. We | should be ready to embrace, or at least consider, all possible methods. ==================== To infer one's position from knowing that a particular star is at the zenith, as Peter has proposed, the time that's needed is not local time; it's Greenwich time. So how does he suggest that Greenwich time should be obtained, without a clock? What he has written above is utter nonsense. George contact George Huxtable at george@huxtable.u-net.com or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222) or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.