NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2025 May 1, 07:36 -0700
Norman B wrote:
"It looks like a linearly increasing factor (starting from 1.000) for correcting the altitudes is a "best fit" for my sightings so far, and that translates to a quadratic function for the arc correction. You see it in the image below [...]"
All I can say at this point, is what the fuck is going on here?! Norman, your words in your latest post are just nonsense --form without meaning. And yes, you made a nice quadratic graph, but so what?! You are dancing through the forms and styles of a conversation about sextant sights and corrections, but I don't see any evidence that you're understanding any of it. Nor do you seem to be learning anything from anyone else here. Can you offer any explanation for the peculiar nature of your posts? Are you playing a game?? Are you asking an A.I. chatbot to produce your posts? Are you actually trying to see how long you can post nonsensical messages before getting called out on it? If so... you have your answer...
Frank Reed
