Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Dark Glass Artificial Horizon
    From: David Pike
    Date: 2017 Oct 6, 14:34 -0700

    I decided to take Amundsen literally and see if it was possible to use the top surface of ‘dark glass’ for a horizon.  I bought the darkest piece of welder’s facemask glass I could find for £1GBP.  I laid it on top of my original plate glass horizon with a piece of mat black card in between and placed a circular level on the top (see Photo).  I actually bought two glasses in case I had to roughen up the rear of one, but this proved unnecessary.  I chose to simulate Amundsen’s situation as closely as possible by using my small mirror Hughes Mates Three Circle sextant and to observe at roughly the same altitude of the Sun.  I calculated that on 14th December 1911 the Sun’s declination was around 23 degrees south and, because the PZX triangle becomes a straight line close to the Pole, the Sun’s altitude would be similar.  This meant I had to observe in the UK today at around 10.00BST.  The first series of observations averaged 32 nm towards, but then I remembered that in my enthusiasm I’d forgotten to level the glass.  After doing this, the intercept reduced to 6 nm towards.  Next I removed the black card, which wasn’t entirely flat.  By this stage the images were boring a hole in the back of my eyeball, partly because I could have done with an extra horizon filter, partly because it was taking ages getting the Sun onto the dark glass, partly because I was having difficulty deciding which image was which, but mainly because I’ve not had a lot of practice with the marine variety of sextant.  Therefore, I only made one more observation, which gave me 2.1nm towards.  I believe that with greater care and practice, and possibly sunglasses, I could get this down to around 1nm.  DaveP

    Date: Friday 13th October 2017 Time 10.44.28 BST 09.44.28 GMT

    Sextant: Hughes Mate’s Three Circle No: 25410         

    Index Error: appears zero

    Arc Calibration Error: Zero in 1941

    Apparent Height: 51.49.1 divided by two = 25.54.6

    Refraction: -2’

    GPS/GLONAS position: N53.10.2 W00032.3

    Hc (Using Navigator): 25.50.5  Ha:25.54.6  Ho:  25.52.6   Intercept: 2.1nm towards



    File:



       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site