NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: De Lurk
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2003 Feb 7, 21:54 -0500
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2003 Feb 7, 21:54 -0500
With all this sole baring, I feel compelled to do likewise. As a youth, I used to teach sailing, and got to do a few yacht deliveries between Maine and south of the Cape, as a crew or coastal pilot. Now I live inland but have managed to maintain a connection to Maine, unfortunately for only two weeks a year. A few years ago, chartered a bare boat up there, but mostly don't sail because the family doesn't like it. I have never sailed offshore, but have a hankering to. So I'm learning celestial and participating in this list; it gets me closer to the sea. I suppose celestial is old fashioned, but it'll get you there, and, from my youth, was the way one got around on the high seas, and a mark of achievement, to be able to refer to oneself as a navigator rather than a pilot. I find celestial absolutely delightful to do, integrating astronomy and precision measurement. On that bare boat charter of a few years ago, the GPS was rigged to indicate heading, but it was about 15 degrees out of whack. I found it easier to plot a few bearings than to plot GPS lat and long, since the GPS wasn't integrated with the chart. I do recall vividly when using the radar, my first exposure to it, that it was like cheating, being able to see right through the fog. Speaking of cheating, when I first undertook celestial, I was delighted to be reducing all my sights by hand, using tables, which was how I was trained through my undergraduate years. But now that I'm grinding out a fair amount of data to check my sextant and technique, I've reverted to computer data analysis (which I do for my day job). It is seductively easier. Fred