NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Direction of travel of the Nav-L list.
From: Dan Hogan
Date: 2003 Jun 8, 16:15 -0700
From: Dan Hogan
Date: 2003 Jun 8, 16:15 -0700
Well, as far as I am concerned, as long as the discussions are about non-electronic navigation of any kind. Occasional diversion to electronic are OK, once in a while. But Dead Reckoning, "Life Raft" navigation, and emergency navigation are all also non- electronic. I don't consider myself the owner of Navigation-L, just the current custodian. On 8 Jun 2003 at 20:40, George Huxtable wrote: > Do others agree that there's been a significant redirection of our list? Is > it a fact of life we should accept and welcome? Should we, can we, do > anything to rebalance it? Am I imagining a problem that doesn't really > exist? What does Dan Hogan think?
