NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Fix by Lunar Distances... for missiles in 1950
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 Dec 03, 21:26 -0500
From: Bill B
Date: 2006 Dec 03, 21:26 -0500
Bill wrote: >> Ah, the stigma attached to practicing tradition navigation today. My >> GPS/Blue Chart hugging sailing buddies now want to go on a geocache hunt. >> They insist I use a sextant! Could be a long day! Richard replied: > Use the sextant sideways on three well placed reference objects, use the > angles between them to plant your own cache, and see if *they* can find it > with GPS. :-) Excellent point. Coming out of Chicago last summer I was playing. From about 3 miles off shore I started taking a series of measurements (with a bit of lab-assistant help). Using Sears and John H we would record our current GPS position, GPS distances, GPS bearings, hockey-puck compass bearings, and angle between structures measured with the sextant. The GPS was set to read out true bearings, and the compass readings were adjusted to true using variation from a government site. As the bases of the structures sank below the horizon and the angular separation became extremely small, we recorded our current GPS position, GPS distance, GPS bearing, hockey-puck compass bearings, and angular height of the Sears Tower above the horizon measured with the sextant. I plotted all the possible combinations. The GPS won in the near-shore tests, but not by much. Often the sextant/compass and GPS points were superimposed. About the 15 mile range, the sextant (Sears angle above horizon) & hockey puck compass started winning at nailing the GPS position. While distances were comparable, the GPS bearing (my Garmin 76 unit reads out in whole degrees) was a tad off the hockey-puck compass bearing. Distance calculate by a modified Bowditch formula with a refraction value *suggested* by Frank and one I derived were all but spot on. So a good day for traditional navigation. It does raise a least two questions. 1. When a GPS unit converts between true and magnetic or vice versa, does it use up-to-date variation values downloaded form a satellite or is it using a lookup table imbedded in its firmware? 2. Is a geocache hunt really an exercise in navigation (except for being able to find your way through a road-map maze to a known point) or is it more being clever enough to find a toy soldier etc. hidden in a hollowed-out fence post when you are <20 feet from it? Bill --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---