NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Fix by Lunar Distances... for missiles in 1950
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 30, 02:13 EST
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Nov 30, 02:13 EST
D Walden, you wrote:
"I'll see if I can get over there in the next few days, unless
someone
else finds it sooner."
else finds it sooner."
Thanks for the offer. Richard Langley has sent me a copy. As it turns out,
it's an interesting article though only tangentially related to what I've been
discussing. The fascinating aspect is that the author does a nice job explaining
how to track the Moon at one arcsecond accuracy, with automated telescopes
aboard a missile, using technology available in 1950. It's rather
impressive that it's possible at all. At this level of accuracy, you have
to worry about the fact that the Moon's visible center is not quite the
same as its center of mass. You also have to worry about a couple of arcseconds
of aberration of light arising from the missile's high speed of
travel. Thompson correctly concludes that it's not worth exploring
the question further, even though the technology might be
feasible, since the technique would only work when the Moon is in the sky.
You can imagine the problem: "I'm sorry, sir, we cannot launch a counter-strike
until the Moon is at least five days old..."
<g>
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---