Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: How far the Moon? How far the Bear?
    From: Diego Melas
    Date: 2026 Nov 5, 23:34 -0800

    Frank,

    I did not identify the photograph. I worked from the image itself. I
    should say plainly that I set out the method and then used an AI
    assistant for the pixel measurements and the ephemeris arithmetic. The
    reasoning below is what I asked it to check, and I am posting it so the
    method can be judged, not the result.

    Scale. The Moon is the ruler. On my copy the disc measures about 9.8
    pixels across at half intensity. Mean apparent diameter is 31.1
    arcminutes, so the scale is 3.2 arcminutes per pixel. Check: over 544
    pixels that is a horizontal field of 28 degrees, about a 70 mm
    equivalent lens. That is normal for a hand-held shot from a cockpit, so
    the scale looks sound. No EXIF and no focal length required.

    Range. The Bear measures 280 pixels, the Raptor 185. Using 49.1 m and
    18.9 m for their lengths, I get about 190 m and about 110 m. Both are
    upper limits, because both aircraft are seen three-quarters on and the
    projected length is shorter than the real one. The solid figure is the
    ratio. The Bear is about 1.7 times farther than the Raptor, and that
    does not depend on the Moon or on the scale.

    Date. The disc is gibbous, near 95 percent lit. Full moon in November
    2007 was on the 24th at 14:30 UT, so the photograph is near the 22nd or
    23rd, or near the 26th or 27th. The upper left limb looks slightly
    darker, which points to waxing, so the 23rd or 24th. At ten pixels I do
    not call that proof.

    The phase gives one more thing. At 95 percent the elongation is at
    least 145 degrees, so Sun and Moon are nearly opposite. The Moon sits
    about 7 degrees above the warm band at the bottom of the frame, so the
    Sun is not down there. That band is the counter twilight, the sky
    opposite the Sun. There is no local glare anywhere, which agrees. The
    Sun is behind the camera.

    With that, and latitude 61 N, the Moon is 7 to 12 degrees high with the
    Sun near the horizon only around 1600 to 1700 local, Moon in the east
    and Sun setting in the west, or around 0830 to 0930, Moon in the west
    and Sun rising in the southeast. So the geometry alone places the
    photograph within about an hour and a half.

    My copy of the image is small and the Moon is only ten pixels wide. On
    the full resolution original the numbers will tighten, and the
    terminator should settle waxing against waning.

    Diego Melas

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join / Get NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site