NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: "Improved" sextants
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Jul 6, 16:07 -0500
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2006 Jul 6, 16:07 -0500
Re aiming a digital level, you asked: "How do you propose to read the level do the sextant sight at the same time" Several models of these digital levels have a button that freezes the reading. You aim at your star and press the button when it's aligned. Point and click. But the commercial models are only accurate to +/-0.1 degrees --plenty good enough, to the point of over-kill for carpentry applications, but not so good for celestial navigation. "I'm already having enough of a challenge trying to get sights with Celestaire's bubble horizon for the Astra - it's a lot like trying to stand on a beach ball in the deep end of the pool. :-) " Yep. That's about the same accuracy and has the same problem. The great thing about a reflecting sextant is that a little tremor of the hand makes no difference at all in the accuracy of the sighting process. When you give up the horizon and try to depend on the accuracy of an internal level, you have to stabilize the platform somehow. -FER 42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W. www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---