NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: "Improved" sextants
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2006 Jul 4, 14:57 -0500
Alexandre E Eremenko wrote:
>
> Dear Red and Lu:
> A sextant with a stabilized telescope will be able to measure to single
> seconds, like a theodolite.
> Then I would add a stabilized dipmeter, and the whole combination
> of sextant/dipmeter will certainly have performance of
> a GPS:-)
Well, providing it's not cloudy out and there's a clear horizon. For
all the joy we take in celestial, let's not forget this major problem
with it....
>>"4. Automatic height-of-eye calculation. "
>
>
> Interesting. How do you propose to do this?
> On what principle?
In my original note I speculated on two way to do this -- one by sonar
ranging to the water's surface, the other by actually lowering a device
to the surface of the water. This would require direct vertical access
to the water such as one would get on a small boat, it wouldn't work on
the bridge of a large ship (unless one is on a full-beam set of wings)
or while taking observations shore-side.
Lu Abel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2006 Jul 4, 14:57 -0500
Alexandre E Eremenko wrote:
>
> Dear Red and Lu:
> A sextant with a stabilized telescope will be able to measure to single
> seconds, like a theodolite.
> Then I would add a stabilized dipmeter, and the whole combination
> of sextant/dipmeter will certainly have performance of
> a GPS:-)
Well, providing it's not cloudy out and there's a clear horizon. For
all the joy we take in celestial, let's not forget this major problem
with it....
>>"4. Automatic height-of-eye calculation. "
>
>
> Interesting. How do you propose to do this?
> On what principle?
In my original note I speculated on two way to do this -- one by sonar
ranging to the water's surface, the other by actually lowering a device
to the surface of the water. This would require direct vertical access
to the water such as one would get on a small boat, it wouldn't work on
the bridge of a large ship (unless one is on a full-beam set of wings)
or while taking observations shore-side.
Lu Abel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---