Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: International Date Line and Earhart/Noonan
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2022 Feb 1, 13:13 -0800

    Dustin Baenen, you wrote:
    "It would be interesting to find out when Weems added the letter and why he chose to do so. "

    Yes, I agree. It's always critical to work within contemporary thinking and assumptions. Aerial celestial navigation in the 1930s was evolving rapidly. Arguably, it was the center of a revolution in celestial navigation generally. Practices that we see as standard and obvious in any decade since the middle of the 20th century may have seemed exotic in 1937. 

    The tools of celestial navigation were also undergoing rapid changes in this period. For example, Gary has pointed out that the author of that flimsy "dateline theory" based her thinking on R.A. or "right ascension" instead of GHA (and SHA). He suggested that this implied she was approaching the topic from an astronomer's point of view. That's quite possible, but bear in mind that GHA as a tabulated parameter in the almanacs was brand new. The concept had been around for decades, and navigators had often calculated values of GHA (though often expressed in hours and minutes, not degrees) from other quantities as part of their work, but our modern standard of tables of GHA and Dec and little else did not yet exist. Parallel listings of GHA alongside the old standard of RA (or the Equation of Time for the Sun) began in the American Nautical Almanac only in 1934 (experiments in earlier years). That's new! Certainly Noonan was plenty smart enough and experienced enough to understand tabulated GHA and see its merits, but you have to step back in time. The American Nautical Almanac for 1937, the year of Earhart's doomed flight, was only the fourth annual edition that featured this new GHA listing. What we see as normal and obvious today was radical and unusual back then.

    You might also wonder why they didn't just use The Nautical Almanac. I've said it before, but it bears repeating: The Nautical Almanac in the 1930s was the equivalent of the modern Astronomical Almanac. It was a reference for astronomers in observatories. 

    Personally, I see these attempts at fiddling with the navigation practices of Noonan and Earhart, as in the "dateline theory", as grasping at straws. They're unprovable, and they reflect the simple fact that we have no real evidence to work with. The aircraft vanished in the middle of an enormous ocean while still marginally in radio contact. Unfortunately that was not a rare event back then. More important than actual geography was the social geography. This famous pioneer of aviation, this exceptional woman intriguing to her public, didn't disappear in the Pacific Ocean; she disappeared on the front pages of newspapers all across America.

    Then again, maybe it was alien abduction, and we'll find Fred and Amelia one day in the Delta Quadrant.

    Frank Reed

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    NavList is a community devoted to the preservation and practice of celestial navigation and other methods of traditional position-finding. We're a group of navigators, navigation enthusiasts and hobbyists, mathematicians and physicists, and historians interested in all aspects of navigation but primarily those techniques which are non-electronic.

    To post a message, if you are already signed up as a NavList member, start a new discussion or reply to any posted message and use your posting code (this is a simple low-security password assigned when you join). You may also join by posting. Your first on-topic messsage automatically makes you a member, and a posting code will be assigned and emailed to you for future posts.

    Uniquely, the NavList message boards also permit full interaction entirely by email. You can optionally receive individual posts or daily digests by email, and any member can post messages by email (bypassing the web site) by sending to our posting address which is "NavList@NavList.net". This functionality is similar to a traditional Internet mailing list: post by email, read by email, reply by email. Most members will prefer the web interface here for posting and replying to messages.

    NavList is more than an online community... more about that another day.

    © Copyright notice: please note that the rights to all messages and posts in this discussion group are held by their respective authors. No messages or text or images extracted from messages may be reproduced without the explicit consent of the message author. Email me, Frank Reed, if you have any questions.

    Join / Get NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site