NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Iterative Lunar method
From: Bruce Cutting
Date: 2019 Feb 27, 09:30 -0700
From: Bruce Cutting
Date: 2019 Feb 27, 09:30 -0700
Wendel- You indicated, you had built software to do your iterative method. For what calculator and in what language Would you be willing to share the software (absolutely commercial purpose here) - the software s the est possible description possible. I have a TI-98 and several other programmable calculators. Thanks! Bruce On Mon, February 25, 2019 20:16, Wendel Brunner wrote: > Hello Frank, > I appreciate your comments. I realize I have much to learn about various > ways of clearing the lunar distance and the observations required, and > especially the descriptions and methods outlined in older navigation > texts when that method of finding Longitude was actually used in > practice. Particularly the understanding that one doesn't have to make > terribly precise measurements of altitudes to clear the Lunar Distance > using many methods. When I started on Lunars in 1992, what I knew about > that process came from reading "Carry On, Mr Bowditch" in middle school, > some terse references in the modern navigation books I had available, the > Hornblower and Jack Aubrey references (fiction, indeed), and especially > the Slocum account in "Sailing Alone Around the World". I planned to > measure the LD and take a series of altitudes of the sun and moon before > and after, and then interpolate. Lacking the Mythical Three Midshipmen, > that seemed to be the only way to do it. But when I couldn't get a Lunar > altitude during my observation opportunity sailing to Hawaii - and > frequently I have found that because of clouds or fog you just can't get > an observation- I had to come up with some other method that works. An > iterative method is often used for a variety of calculations, from square > roots to polynomial solutions, so it was natural to try it for this > problem. Iterative methods lend themselves to programmable > calculator/computer solutions; I believe the StarPath calculator uses the > same approach to calculating Lunars. And while Slocum's account may be > just a footnote or less in the body of navigation information on Lunars, > his book has had a major impact on inspiring modern sailors. I had heard > about Slocum's Lunar feat from my older sailing mentors. After I read > that book and in contemplating my own ocean voyage, like many others I > wanted to recapitulate some part of Slocum's experience for myself. > Sailing single headed through the Straits of Magellan was probably not in > the cards for me, but with my celestial skills, I could attempt to > emulate Slocum's lunar feat. So that gets to your basic question, "why do > you want to do Lunars"? Certainly not to find Longitude. In fact, there > is really no practical reason for celestial navigation at all anymore, > although I suspect there are many on this forum who would bristle at that > suggestion. The apocalyptic lightning strike that fries all the > electronics including the spare pocket GPS tucked away in some shielded > place seems unlikely. From reading you describe your rich investigation of > the manuals and methods, as well as the myths and misconceptions, of how > Lunar navigation was developed and taught in the time when it was > important for navigation, I would guess that for you one reason is to be > able to do Lunars in a way similar to how it was done in the 18th and > 19th Centuries, but perhaps better. Or maybe I am just thinking that is > what I would like to learn now. For me the reason to do a Lunar is also > linked to appreciating how we came to our understanding of the world. > While the explorers opened up the oceans, the astronomers expanded the > heavens, breaking out of the confining celestial spheres of the > earth-centered Ptolemaic theory and into the vast expanse of of the > Copernican universe. Kepler, Galileo and Newton clarified the celestial > realm, and sailors equipped with crude instruments to use that knowledge > headed out into unknown terrestrial oceans-and sometimes came back. There > are certainly better ways to get position than a Lunar Distance, or for > that matter, quicker ways to cross an ocean than to be blown about in a > sailboat. Staring at the dials of a GPS tells precisely where you are, > but a carefully worked out Lunar does more- it connects us with our past, > with the navigators of the oceans and the mind who puzzled out the > heavens and the earth. The GPS tells position, but a Lunar fix reminds > you also where you have come from. As Joshua Slocum wrote in 1899,"The > work of the Lunarian, although seldom practiced in these days of > chronometers, is beautifully edifying and there is nothing in the realm > of navigation that lifts one's heart up more in adoration" Wendel Brunner > > > [plain text auto-generated] > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > NavList message boards and member settings: http://fer3.com/NavList > Members may optionally receive posts by email. > To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > : > http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Iterative-Lunar-method-Brunner-feb-2019-g44426