NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Kollsman averagers
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2009 Nov 25, 13:07 -0800
--
NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList+@fer3.com
From: Gary LaPook
Date: 2009 Nov 25, 13:07 -0800
That's interesting, I wonder why only the American ones have a one
minute averager. I have attached the operating manual and paragraph
2-12 clearly states that it only runs for one minute.
gl
Werner wrote:
gl
Werner wrote:
All my Kollsman periscopic sextants with the pendulous mirror (made in Germany and UK, under Kollsman licence) have the two minutes averager. Werner Am Mittwoch, 25. November 2009 20:24:22 schrieb Gary LaPook:Even if the individual sights within the average are more accurate with the MA-1 than with the bubble instruments the mirror is still subject to the same accelerations as the bubble. These are of two types, random, caused by turbulence, and periodic, caused by the normal oscillations of the aircraft about its three axes such as phugoid and dutch roll, with are sinusoidal in nature. To eliminate or minimize the random errors "more is better." Taking a greater number of sights will result in a better average so taking more sights during the two minute period works for both bubble and mirror artificial horizons. The natural oscillation period of large aircraft is about 40 seconds and to minimize the errors caused by them it is best if the averaging period matches the period of the aircraft or exact multiples of it. Two minutes matches three such periods while one minute is only one and a half periods and so will leave an inherent error in the data and the bias will depend upon where in the cycle the observation starts. gl douglas.denny@btopenworld.com wrote:May I offer a possible explanation? It is only a guess however. The pendulous reference is easier to use than a bubble, being an horizon indicator rather than a circle in which the star is placed. This I believe gives simpler and greater accuracy of observation than a bubble where the observer has to estimate the centre placement of the star in the bubble, and hence would require less time to complete an assessment of the star alignment with the reference. The oscillation period of a large aircraft I would have expected to be within a minute anyway, so anything above one minute is not necessarily going to increase accuracy on this count. The only increase in accuracy would be if there are longer term accelerations present (such as an unwanted inadvertent side-slip) corrected within the time period of observation. The only answer must be ultimately that tests would have been carried out by Kollsman and they probably found little difference in results for the one minute as opposed to two minute observation periods. Douglas Denny. Chichester. England.
NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList+@fer3.com