NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: L/Lo mapping
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2006 Nov 13, 13:22 -0800
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2006 Nov 13, 13:22 -0800
I just tried the boulter.com/gps site (even cutting-and-pasting the url below to make sure I hadn't misspelled it). One thing I noticed is that it isn't quite smart enough to recognize just degrees of latitude and longitude. Since I live near San Francisco, I tried just typing in 38 -122 as an approximate L/Lo (by convention, west longitude is considered negative). No response. "Whoops," I thought, "forgot to add minutes. So I tried 38 00 -122 00. Still no response. Finally tried 38 00.0 -122 00.0 and got a map of Concord CA, just east of SF. Boulter is a manager at Yahoo and does geocaching as a hobby, he put together the site as a way of allowing other geocachers to quickly get maps to a specific L/Lo. So we should forgive him if the site isn't quite perfect, it's a work of love (but I sure wish it would let me know when it can't figure out my input rather than just silently failing). Hope this helps. Lu Abel Michael Dorl wrote: > > >>James R. Van Zandt wrote: >> >>True. Google seems to be the one site that obviously supports L/Lo >>input. Other sites (such as Yahoo) will accept it but it's a hidden >>interface. The site I referred to, boulter.com/gps, links to 14 >>different mapping sites. > > > Is my browser broken or is this page non-functional? I put in my > coordinates per the example but none of the active links do anything. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---