NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Land Lunar
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2017 Jan 06, 15:10 -0800
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2017 Jan 06, 15:10 -0800
On 2017-01-05 17:28, John D. Howard wrote: > If you set up a telescope ( transit, theolodite ) looking 180 true or 360 if south and lock the azimuth. With only a hack watch needed you note the merdian passage of a star then the moon, making note of the time difference. Now the time difference is just difference in GHA. What you have described is the core idea of moon culminations, an old method to determine longitudes of fixed points. The largest error came from the Moon ephemeris, so transits were also observed from a point of known longitude. That cancelled the ephemeris error, and you ended up with the longitude difference between the observatories. Lunar culminations generally had lower accuracy than the mechanical solution of transporting sets of chronometers back and forth between the observatories. Chauvenet describes moon culminations and other old longitude methods: https://books.google.com/books?id=6JlzJHd15vQC&pg=PA13&focus=viewport Results of lunar culminations and chronometer transportation to fix the longitude difference between America and Greenwich are in the U.S. Coast Survey annual reports from the 1850s and 60s.