NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lights,Leds and scopes etc.
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2003 Oct 14, 16:20 -0400
From: Fred Hebard
Date: 2003 Oct 14, 16:20 -0400
The amount of energy in a foot candle or lumen is dependent upon the frequency distribution of the emitted light. LEDs usually have a very narrow frequency band in which they emit light, so would be much more efficient than incandescent light sources (more-or-less more lumens per watt). Fred On Tuesday, Oct 14, 2003, at 15:50 US/Eastern, Rino van Dam wrote: > Found this on the 'Net: > > Perry's handbook of Chemical Engineering - Conversion tables 1-7 > > to convert from to multiply by > > Candle power(spherical) lumens 12.556 > > lumens watts .001496 > > > result .0188 watts/CP > > Rino > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Navigation Mailing List > [mailto:NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM] > On Behalf Of David Weilacher > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 15:41 > To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM > Subject: Re: Lights,Leds and scopes etc. > > > Does anyone have a 'workable' (as opposed to accurate) formula for > converting between lumens, candlepower, and watts (lighting)? > > Is candlepower and candela synonimous? > > Is it true that a WW2 pilot could see a candle burning in a window at 8 > miles? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: George Huxtable> Sent: Oct 14, 2003 3:39 PM > To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM > Subject: Re: Lights,Leds and scopes etc. > > Earlier today, I sent a mailing as follows (in part)- > >> Jared Sherman said- >> >>> 12 LED's, typically 40mA each. That would draw 0.48 Amps, >> >> Comment from George- >> >> That's not the way anyone would drive such an array, not if he was >> trying to conserve the power taken a 12-volt power source. >> >> Instead, the diodes should be strung together IN SERIES, as far as >> possible. It depends somewhat on the details of the specified voltage >> drop across each LED at full output, but 4 or 5 such diodes connected >> in series should still add up to less than 10 volts, allowing a >> somewhat-depleted battery to drive them, with a bit of "headroom" for >> a >> current-regulator to work properly. >> >> Each such diode string would require a separate current regulator. If >> a >> 12-diode array was made up of, say, 3 such strings, then the overall >> battery drain would then be only 0.12 Amps, not 0.48 Amps as Jared >> suggests. Three separate current regulators would be required in this >> case, each able to cope with dissipation about 0.2 Watts to deal with >> the enhanced voltage on the rail with a highly-charged battery and a >> running >> engine: this is not very demanding. > > ================= > > Some of that was certainly wrong, and I would like to backtrack, with > some > apologies. > > Dave Weilacher posted- > >> How about looking at this site and commenting. >> >> http://www.superbrightleds.com/ > > > So I did; and there found some detailed specifications for superbright > LED's, reg, green, and others. > > And discovered that for the green LEDs, the forward voltage drop at > maximum > output was significantly greater than I expected, between 3.5 and 4 > volts. > > That implies that it would be quite impossible to power "4 or 5 such > diodes" > from a 12 volt supply, as I had suggested. In fact, one could > series-up no > more than two such diodes: which would still be worth doing, for > current > economy, rather than connecting them in parallel. Each series pair > would > then need its own current driver. > > For the red diodes, the voltage drop is significantly less, and it > would be > quite practicable to connect 4 such diodes in series (but not 5), with > a > current driver. > > Sorry to get that wrong. > > In view of these higher voltage drops, the use of a current-regulated > power > supply, providing sufficient voltage step-up to drive all the diodes > in a > lamp in a single series chain (as in the "orcagreen" lamps), seems a > rather > sensible alternative. > > George. > > ================================================================ > contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by > phone at > 01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy > Lane, > Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK. > ================================================================ > > > Dave Weilacher > .US Coast Guard licensed captain > . #889968 > .ASA instructor evaluator and celestial > . navigation instructor #990800 > .IBM AS400 RPG contract programmer > >