NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

HOME

Re: Linear regression and other tools
From: Antoine Couëtte
Date: 2018 Oct 11, 12:00 -0700

Re : Linear-regression-other-tools-Morris-oct-2018-g43043

Dear Brad,

The average value of a set - here observations times and heights - belongs to the linear regression of this set.

For a given set of observations, if you are in a position to use only its average value, you are using the whole set to its best. In other words: you are using absolutely all information contained in this set, and you are not discarting any information contained in it.

Hence - for CelNav at least - [absolutely] no need to "linear regress": simply "average".

Whenever possible I personally recommend 5 observations for each and any celestial body over a maximum time span of 4 minutes of time, a duration during which second and higher order terms are always negligible - i.e. less than 0.1' - whatever the height observed. Essential reason for that ? 5 observations reduce random errors by a factor slighly above 2 (actually by the square root of 5). To reduce Random error by 3 would require 9 observations - by 4 would be 16 !!! - which is totally unrealistic as linear regression should then be replaced by at least 2nd Order Regression, which involves many more "guessing fitting" parameters.

Also, up to 4 minutes devoted to one single Body, espacially at dawn or dusk remains acceptable. You should have plenty of time to "multi shoot" at least 2 extra bodies, or even 3 extra bodies.

Observing and averaging 4 different bodies with 5 observations on each of them is an excellent practical trade-off between random error minimizing and the workload of 20 different observations.

Antoine M. "Kermit" Couëtte

What is NavList?

NavList is a community devoted to the preservation and practice of celestial navigation and other methods of traditional position-finding. We're a group of navigators, navigation enthusiasts and hobbyists, mathematicians and physicists, and historians interested in all aspects of navigation but primarily those techniques which are non-electronic.

To post a message, if you are already signed up as a NavList member, start a new discussion or reply to any posted message and use your posting code (this is a simple low-security password assigned when you join). You may also join by posting. Your first on-topic messsage automatically makes you a member, and a posting code will be assigned and emailed to you for future posts.

Uniquely, the NavList message boards also permit full interaction entirely by email. You can optionally receive individual posts or daily digests by email, and any member can post messages by email (bypassing the web site) by sending to our posting address which is "NavList@NavList.net". This functionality is similar to a traditional Internet mailing list: post by email, read by email, reply by email. Most members will prefer the web interface here for posting and replying to messages.

NavList is more than an online community... more about that another day.

© Copyright notice: please note that the rights to all messages and posts in this discussion group are held by their respective authors. No messages or text or images extracted from messages may be reproduced without the explicit consent of the message author. Email me, Frank Reed, if you have any questions.

Subject:
Author:
Start date:	(yyyymm dd)
End date:	(yyyymm dd)

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

NavList

What is NavList?

Join / Get NavList ID Code

Retrieve a NavList ID Code

Email Settings

Custom Index

Add Images & Files
Name or NavList Code:	Email:

Name:
	(please, no nicknames or handles)
Email:

NavList ID Code: