NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Long term almanac
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2026 Aug 17, 15:23 -0700
From: Paul Hirose
Date: 2026 Aug 17, 15:23 -0700
> *From: *Jacquelin Hardy > *Date: *2026 Aug 16, 13:45 -0700 > > I found something strange : > for example, on a 4 stars fix spread on a 20 minutes period, they don't > seem to carry all the sights to the same time of one specific star , DR > updated with course and speed of the ship. > If this is not done, of course, the fix will be a large triangle, > especially at 25 knots... Here is the Nautical Almanac algorithm for direct calculation of position from azimuth and intercept: https://archive.org/details/isbn_9780707741062/page/282/mode/1up It's not necessary to adjust a round of celestial observations to the same time. Suppose you had a device to track a celestial body and continuously display its azimuth and intercept with respect to your dead reckoning position. You would see the output remain almost constant over a span of several minutes, since DR error doesn't change much. Thus, you can plot estimated position at some convenient time, say the nearest whole hour, and plot azimuths and intercepts from a round of sights as if all had been taken at that time and place. However, that simple scheme only works if each sight was reduced for the time and DR of the observation. Electronic calculation or HO 211 allows this. But if sights are reduced for assumed positions selected to give whole degrees of latitude and hour angle, intercepts can be tens of miles even when the dead reckoning is dead accurate. -- Paul Hirose sofajpl.com






