NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
From: Greg Rudzinski
Date: 2012 Dec 20, 16:33 -0800
Hanno,
I think Weems used secants cosecants for the convenience of adding rather than subtracting logs. Fewer mistakes are made when adding vs. subtraction.
Greg Rudzinski
[NavList] Re: Longitude by Time Sight...good enough at sea?
From: Hanno Ix
Date: 20 Dec 2012 15:41
Question:
As you know it is a simple arithmetic to write his [cos(t/2)]^2- formula (pg15)
in terms of sine, cosine. And since he uses logarithms anyway, there is
effectively no difference at all:
log10(sec(70deg)) = + 0.46595 and log10(cos(70deg)) = - 0.46595.
So, when ignoring the minus sign his table is a log10(cos())
and a log10(sin()) anyway.
He even transfers sin^2 into cosec^2 which complicates things.
Is there a particuler reason why Weems uses cosecants, secants
rather than the more familiar sine, cosine?
h
----------------------------------------------------------------
NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
Members may optionally receive posts by email.
To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
----------------------------------------------------------------