Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Loss of accuracy using Sun over Sun with a mercury artificial horizon?
    From: David Pike
    Date: 2016 Jul 18, 00:57 -0700

    It’s easy to see why edge shooting and semi-diameter are used when shooting the Sun against a sea horizon, but is it so necessary when using a mercury AH?  You’re not trying to guess the centre, just place one circle over another.  I appreciate that the Sun doesn’t always appear as a perfect circle, especially at low altitudes, so that might present a problem, but on the other hand, you’re excused trying to remember, possibly in a stressful situation, if the semi-diameters should be added, subtracted, multiplied by two, or divided by two.  Has anyone any experience of how much accuracy is lost using Sun on Sun compared to edge on edge with an artificial horizon?  DaveP

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site