NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Lunar Distances with Alex's SNO-T
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 Dec 3, 19:11 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2006 Dec 3, 19:11 -0500
I made some further testing of this SNO-T sextant, following an advise of Frank (who tried it for several weeks). His advise was to slacken the pressure of the misterious adjusting screw on the drum (this tiny SNO-T screw was discussed several times on the old list). As a result, the worm can be rotated now with very light effort. The results seem to be satisfactory. (Previously, more than a year ago, I actually tightened this screw myself, thinking that I couldprevent or remove backlash this way). Nov 21 IC from Sun -0.4, 4SD exact Nov 22 IC from Sun -0.5, 4SD exact Using IC=-0.5: Deneb-Vega at 24d 3 observations, errors: 0.0, 0.2, 0.1 Altair-Deneb at 38d 4 observations, errors: 0.3, 0.0, 0.0, 0.3 Nov. 23 IC=-0.5 from Altair, 6 obs, sigma=0.2 Using IC=-0.5: Deneb-Vega at 24d, 3 observations, errors: 0.1, 0.1, 0.0 Altair-Deneb at 38d, 4 obs 0.0, 0.2, -0.2, 0.2 Nov. 24 lunars: Sun-Moon at 46 degrees, errors: 0.3, 0.2, 0.2, -0.1, 0.2, Average error 0.16, sigma=0.15 Sun-Moon at 47 degrees, errors: 0.1, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.1, Average error 0.16, sigma=0.09. Dec. 2 IC=-0.45 from Sun 4SD exact, 5 obs, sigma=0.15 Using IC=-0.45 Dec. 2 lunars: Moon-Altair at 99 degrees, errors: -0.1, 0.0, 0.4, -0.2, -0.1, average error 0.0, sigma=0.23. Alex. On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Bill wrote: > > > Bill, you wrote: > > "Point being, I seriously doubt the lasers you refer to meet the standards of > > both monochromatic and collimated light. " > > Frank replied: > > They're real lasers. They produce monochromatic, coherent light --no > > cheating on the terminology. All lasers have some beam spread, and you can > > counteract it, up to the diffraction limit, using a telescope... > > Ok. I'm buying into that. Been shopping. Found a straight-line laser for > $5 after rebate at Ace. It's nice as the height in relation to the eyepiece > doesn't matter much, and very easy to center on eye-side scope lens, but it > does not produce the fine spike that a point source produces. > > Borrowed a friend's "Taiwan Tom" level laser complete with tripod and all > the niceties, but the off/on knob is on the front so one cannot center the > beam up with the scope. > > Finally, after realizing batteries for my aging Compaq pen/pointer gimme > would be $12 and considering that a poor investment as the dot is more of an > ellipse than a circle, I ferreted out a laser pointer/led light/pen at Wal > Mart for the princely sum of $2.88! It works very well, with a fine > vertical diffraction line. > > Refining rigs to mount it now, as well as producing a circle to mount on the > eye end of the scope with a tiny hole to be sure I am shooting down the > center of the scope. Centering the spot on the glass/mirror section of the > horizon mirror is simple trial and error and can be done satisfactorily by > eye. > > Using George's suggesting on how to determine the distance between the > horizon mirror and index mirror working points, I set up the rigs for trial > runs. The distance was only 40 ft, but the results were right on (probably > beginner�s luck.) > > Last sun IE check was 0.788' on the arc. When matching the predetermined > mirror distance, the sextant reading was just a hair below 0.8' on the arc. > > I'm looking forward to more stringent tests as greater distances. > > Thanks for the idea Frank. > > Alex > > You ready to grab some sextants, a pair of FRS radios and go play? > > Bill > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---